Evidence builder
Turn what you have done into evidence you can use.
So your gap analysis, your CV and your interview preparation all have something real to work from. CareerPathIQ asks the questions a good adviser would ask and structures your answers — the facts stay yours, and it never invents an achievement.
How it works
- 1Prompt
- 2Your words
- 3Stronger evidence
- 4Feeds targets, CV, interview
Prompts are questions, never pre-filled answers. Example shown is illustrative.
Evidence Builder workspace
Illustrative example — not your evidenceShift supervisor
Care provider · Mar 2021 – Present
Prompt — the platform asks
What did you achieve in this role? Add a number where you can — by how much, over what period?
Your answer — achievement
Your words“Planned and ran the rota for [team size] across [sites], cutting [what changed] by [how much] over [period].”
The bracketed facts come from you. Prompts ask — they never pre-fill, and nothing is saved without your confirmation.
Evidence vs capability
The gap is not always the capability. Sometimes the evidence is simply missing.
Two honest lanes, matching how the product actually works — requirements re-measure deterministically; narrative evidence strengthens how your record reads.
Skill & qualification requirements
The deterministic lane
- Target requirement
- Needs evidence
- You record the skill or qualification
- Exact match, re-measured
- Confirmed
The same record against the same requirement always produces the same state. Nothing is estimated.
Achievements & responsibilities
The narrative lane
- Prompted questions
- Your real example
- Recorded with provenance
- CV · keyword coverage · interview material
Narrative evidence strengthens how your record reads. It does not flip a requirement state — only a recorded skill or qualification does.
Illustrative“Needs evidence” describes your record, not your ability. Recording real experience may resolve it.
Evidence“Helped improve response times for the team.”
Ownership
Needs stronger evidenceWas this yours to lead, or the team's?
Written as “the team improved response times” — unclear whether this was your decision or the team's.
Scale
Needs stronger evidenceHow large was the budget, team or remit?
No number given for team size, budget or volume affected.
Recency
EvidencedHow recently did you do it?
Dated to a role held in the last two years.
Outcome
Needs stronger evidenceWhat actually changed as a result?
No stated result — what changed because of it is not said.
Specificity
Needs stronger evidenceIs it specific enough to be checked?
General wording — no named process, system or period to check it against.
Illustrative example — the same sentence, examined dimension by dimension, is what a stronger rewrite has to address.
What it asks
The questions a good adviser would ask.
Every prompt below is a real prompt string from the product — deterministic, role-aware where the role library supports it, and never an answer in disguise.
Duty & scope prompts
“What were you responsible for day-to-day?” “What decisions were yours to make?” — asked per role, under Responsibilities.
Outcome prompts
“What did you achieve in this role? Add a number where you can — by how much, over what period?” — asked under Achievements.
Role-specific prompts
Where your role matches the role library, prompts are drawn from its recorded responsibilities, skills and keywords.
Industry-aware prompts
Where the employer's industry is recorded, prompts pick up that industry's themes — “In domiciliary care: …”.
Questions, never answers
Prompts are display-only questions. They never pre-fill content, and nothing enters your record without you typing it.
Wording, guarded
Optional AI rephrasing runs through a deterministic guard that blocks any proposed line adding a number, date, entity or qualification you didn't state.
What gets recorded
Structured once, in your own words.
The record holds exactly what you enter — these are the real fields, nothing more.
Roles
Title, employer, location, dates and employment type for each position — the source every piece of evidence is attributed to.
Achievements & responsibilities
Your statements, tagged by kind, each carrying its provenance — “Your words”, or “Improved wording — you confirmed”.
Skills
Recorded skill by skill, with your own confirmation flag. These are what skill requirements are matched against — exact, deterministic comparison.
Qualifications, memberships & credentials
Level, institution, year, chartered status — the records qualification requirements are checked against.
What makes evidence useful
What the prompts draw out.
These are prompts, not mandatory fields — but evidence that carries them reads clearly and measures cleanly.
- The role it came from — every statement keeps its source position
- What you personally did, not just what the team did
- Scope and scale — people, budgets, sites, volume, where true
- The outcome the work actually produced
- Dates and context that anchor it in your real history
- Skills and qualifications recorded where requirements can match them
Where the evidence goes
What happens with this evidence.
Only the integrations that genuinely exist — nothing reads your record that isn't listed here.
Gap analysis & targets
Recorded skills and qualifications re-measure requirement states against your target role — deterministically, every time.
CV assembly
Your achievements and responsibilities are ordered, capped and assembled into the CV — with an optional selected-achievements section.
Keyword coverage
As you edit, your statements are measured against the keywords recorded for your primary target role.
Interview practice
Practice questions are built from your target's requirement states — evidenced requirements become “tell me about a time” prompts.
Professional summary
Summary drafts are composed from your recorded evidence — never from invented claims.
Nowhere else
Not to an employer or recruiter without your explicit share. Not into any ranking, screening or selection output.
The boundary
What CareerPathIQ will never do.
- Invent metrics, outcomes or responsibilities
- Turn assumptions into facts on your record
- Claim employer verification of anything you write
- Infer qualifications or credentials you haven't recorded
- Treat missing evidence as missing capability
- Manufacture an example because a requirement is blank
The trust line
We will never invent your career.
“The AI improves the language — never the facts.”
- Asked, not assumed. Every evidence statement starts as something you said.
- Confirmed, not generated. AI may help phrase a line; a deterministic guard blocks any line that adds a fact, and nothing is saved without your confirmation.
- Yours, permanently. Private to you, exportable, and deletable at any time.
Build the evidence once.
Start free and turn what you have actually done into evidence that works across your gap analysis, CV and interview preparation.